August 3rd, 2001
Time:
11:05
News
Communiqué.
Social
assistance programmes in
Canada:
commission of criminal negligence
The
insufficient amount of
financial assistance given to people in need
constitues a
*criminal* act
according to Article 228, "Killing by influence
on the mind", of
the Criminel Code
and is tantamount to "homicide".
The
Gov't has a fiduciary
responsibility to exercise "care" with those
"in need". Failure to do
so constitutes criminal negligence.
In
accordance with Article 7
of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, the
Gov't must ensure the
"security" of its citizens and
in accordance with Article
12 the Gov't
must see to it that its citizens
are protected from "cruel and unusual punishment".
I,
therefore, call on the Prime
Minister and the Minister of Justice to
respect The Rule of Law and remedy the situation right away by
providing
individuals
in need with enough money to pay their rent
and to buy
food so they don't find themselves on the street home-
less
and then a
more serious burden to
society and an eye sore
for tourists.
For
rent in Ontario I'm
allowed only $325 when my rent is $590.
Am I to break
my lease? Get rid of all my belongings? And where
am I to find a
place for $325? It is completely aburd. Plus, I
have only been given only
$195 to live on for a
whole month.
This is nothing short of
cruel and
unusual punishment contrary
to Article 12
of the
Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms.
Because
provincial authority
is derived from the federal Gov't for
such things as transfer payments and shared responsibility in
things such as
health and education, the Prime Minister cannot
claim the inadequate
funding of
those in financial need is *solely*
a "provincial matter".
In
summary, inadequate social
assistance constitutes an infraction
of
*BOTH* the Criminal Code, Article 228, and The Canadian Char-
ter of Rights and Freedoms, Articles 7 and 12.
The
Government is clearly
acting in a criminal capacity by giving
the poor SUCH AN INADEQUATE AMOUNT OF MONEY to live
on.
It's criminal negligence of the highest order given
the Gov't's ability to pay: Canada is such a rich
nation that it can adequately look after its poor.
This inhumane treatment of the poor is contrary to Canada's
Rule of Law.
Kenneth Selin
~~~
B.A.
(Psychology), B.A.(Spanish),
B.Adm.,
B.Comm. B.A.(Italian) magna cum laude
~~~
P.S.: I was
told into my 8th year
working at the Senate of Canada
that if I did NOT get on the gravy
train that I would lose my
job. Six months later at Christmas Time I was given a 6-month
notice of termination
of employment. The reason given was
that I was a "contractual" employee. This was NOT true as
I was "permanent". I went to see the Clerk of the Senate,
Mr.
Lussier, to for a
grand-father clause. He
ignored me. So
I went to the Public Service Alliance of Canada. Ms. Yolande
Viau was in charged with helping me to organize the Hill. I
still lost my job and she went on to teach
labor law at the
University of Ottawa. However, six months later after leaving
the Senate the Public
Service Alliance of Canada invited me
to do my Union Steward course though
I was unemployed
for which they paid me $50. I have a certificate to prove it
signed by Daryl Bean, dated 9th
and 10th of March 1985.
|